FLOW
Follow FLOW:
TwitterFacebook
Families Genera Species Names Vernacular names Publications Authors Geographical distribution Associated taxa Fossils Images Type specimens repositories Synopsis Updates Classification contactProjectFulgoromorpha
English
English
Chronological account
Flata nava Say, 1830 previous combination of Poeciloptera nava (Say, 1830) according to Schaum (1850): 72
Poeciloptera nava (Say, 1830) previous combination of Phypia nava (Say, 1830) according to Van Duzee (1890): 389
Phypia nava (Say, 1830) previous combination of Helicoptera nava (Say, 1830) according to Osborn (1892): 127 (p. 13)
Helicoptera nava (Say, 1830) previous combination of Catonia nava (Say, 1830) according to Swezey (1904): 23
Catonia nava bifasciata Metcalf, 1948 synonym of Catonia nava (Say, 1830) according to Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
Use(s) (chresonymy)
Poeciloptera naeva (Say, 1830) wrong spelling of Poeciloptera nava (Say, 1830) in Schaum (1850): 72 corrected by Metcalf (1948): 32
Flata nava var. a Say, 1830 nomen nudum of Catonia nava bifasciata Metcalf, 1948 according to Metcalf (1948): 33
Poeciloptera noeva (Say, 1830) wrong spelling of Poeciloptera nava (Say, 1830) in Walker (1851): 469 corrected by Metcalf (1948): 32
Poeciloptera nova (Say, 1830) wrong spelling of Poeciloptera nava (Say, 1830) in Smith (1890): 438 corrected by Metcalf (1948): 32
Flata noeva Say, 1830 wrong spelling of Flata nava Say, 1830 in Melichar (1902): 230 corrected by Metcalf (1948): 32
Geographical distribution
Canada (Ontario)  according to  Van Duzee (1917): 728, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
Florida  according to  Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Arkansas)  according to  Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Delaware)  according to  Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (District of Columbia)  according to  Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Florida, nearctic)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19
United States of America (Georgia)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Illinois)  according to  Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Indiana)  according to  Say (1830): 239, O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Iowa)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Kansas)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Louisiana)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Maryland)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Mississippi)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Missouri)  according to  Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Nebraska)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (New York)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (North Carolina)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Ohio)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Pennsylvania)  according to  Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Tennessee)  according to  Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Texas)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
United States of America (Virginia)  according to  O'Brien (1971): 19, Bartlett et al. (2014): 80
Distribution map: extant taxa
Data accuracy
Level 4
Levels 1, 2 and 3
(TDWG standard) GBIF occurrences